Real Designers Solve Problems, Not Just Decorate
The biggest misconception about design? That it’s about making things look good.
Good design isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about solving problems. It’s about ensuring that visuals serve a purpose, drive engagement, and enhance functionality. And yet, too many companies still see designers as production artists rather than strategic thinkers.
I’ve spent my career bridging that gap, showing teams that design is not just execution—it’s intelligence applied visually.
At Ziff-Davis Publishing, I had to prove this over and over again: Why structured workflows weren’t just “organization,” but critical to scaling design for multi-platform output. Why typography choices weren’t just about “what looks good,” but how readability impacts engagement. Why file formats and non-destructive workflows weren’t just a preference, but essential for preventing costly mistakes downstream.
Every successful designer I’ve worked with understood this: their role was not just to create, but to think.
Design Thinking: What It Actually Means
“Design Thinking” has become a buzzword in corporate spaces, but too few people understand what it actually entails. It’s not about brainstorming cool ideas or making mood boards—it’s about applying critical thinking to solve complex problems.
At its core, Design Thinking follows a structured process:
- Empathize – Understand the real needs of the audience, user, or client.
- Define – Identify the root problem that needs to be solved.
- Ideate – Develop potential solutions, thinking beyond obvious choices.
- Prototype – Create and test scalable versions before full execution.
- Implement & Iterate – Refine based on feedback and performance metrics.
This process applies far beyond traditional graphic design.
UX designers use it to create seamless digital experiences. Brand strategists use it to build identity systems that evolve with a company. Marketing teams use it to create campaigns that actually resonate.
Companies that embed Design Thinking into their approach outperform those that treat design as an afterthought.
Filtering the Noise: A Structured Evaluation Framework for Designers
One of the hardest things for young designers? Deciphering what feedback is useful and what is just noise.
Too often, design critiques are:
- Based on personal taste, not function.
- Focused on what “could have been done differently” rather than whether it works.
- Tearing down work rather than making it stronger.
To filter out unproductive feedback, designers need a repeatable, function-driven framework for evaluating their own work. Here’s how:
The Function-First Design Evaluation Framework
When reviewing your own work (or external feedback), ask these five core questions:
- Clarity: Does it communicate the intended message instantly?
- Usability: Is it intuitive for the end user?
- Scalability: Can it adapt to different formats without breaking?
- Efficiency: Does it reduce friction in execution or workflow?
- Longevity: Will it still function well in six months? A year?
If the design checks these boxes, then it is functionally strong—regardless of personal opinions. If a critique doesn’t address one of these, it’s probably just noise.
Young designers need to understand this early: Not all feedback is worth listening to. The best designers filter the useful from the useless, ensuring that their work remains function-driven, not just aesthetically judged.
The Consequences of Ignoring Design Thinking
Scenario 1: The Failed Rebrand
A company rushes into a rebranding effort without user research. The new identity looks modern, but it alienates the brand’s loyal customer base.
Cost to fix: Millions in lost revenue, plus the cost of re-rebranding.
Scenario 2: The Broken Website
A corporate website is redesigned without usability testing. It looks beautiful but frustrates users, leading to higher bounce rates and fewer conversions.
Cost to fix: A full website overhaul, plus lost business during the transition.
Scenario 3: The Print Disaster
An ad campaign is developed without considering multi-platform execution. The digital files don’t work for print, requiring rushed redesigns before launch.
Cost to fix: Tens of thousands in last-minute production costs.
Every single one of these failures could have been prevented if Design Thinking had been applied upfront.
Collaboration: The Missing Link in Design Education
The best designers don’t work in isolation. They collaborate—with developers, strategists, marketing teams, and stakeholders—to create solutions that work across different mediums and audiences.
And yet, most designers aren’t taught how to navigate cross-functional teams or communicate design rationale to non-designers.
This is a huge gap in design education. Knowing how to:
- Defend design decisions with strategic reasoning.
- Translate complex design choices into language business leaders understand.
- Work within multi-disciplinary teams without getting sidelined.
…is just as critical as knowing how to use Photoshop, Figma, or Illustrator.
If designers don’t know how to advocate for their work, they’ll get stuck taking orders instead of influencing decisions.
Why Design Thinking and Collaboration Set Professionals Apart
The difference between a mid-tier designer and a high-level design leader isn’t just skill—it’s how they think and communicate.
Designers who understand how to:
- Solve real business problems through design.
- Present their work with strategic clarity.
- Collaborate effectively with non-designers.
…become invaluable.
The designers who embrace this mindset? They become creative directors, brand strategists, and sought-after consultants.
The ones who don’t? They stay stuck in endless production cycles, undervalued and replaceable.
What Happens Next?
The final two posts in this series will focus on what designers can do to sustain themselves and their creativity in an industry that demands constant adaptation.
Up next: How to sustain creative flow, avoid burnout, and hold onto joy—even in a broken system.
Because in the end, the best designers aren’t just the ones who survive industry shifts.
They’re the ones who keep evolving—on their own terms.
ES 
EN 
FR